No subscription or hidden extras
Read through the most famous quotes by topic #philosophy
لعل أخطر ما يجابه أي تجربة في التحول الديمقراطي هو التعامل مع الأفكار بصرف النظر عن نوعها ومصدرها- كمطلق ينبغي تكراره; وأعني من حيث ما تنطوي عليه الإطلاقية, عموماً, من الإهدار الكامل للفكرة الإنسانية. وإذا كانت الفكرة الدينية هي الأكثر إغراء بالتعامل معها كمطلق, فإن تحليلاً لظاهرة الدين والوحي, علي العموم, ينتهي إلي وجوب الوعي بدخول العنصر البشري, علي نحو حاسم, في التركيب المنطقي واللغوي والتاريخي لتلك الظاهرة; وعلي النحو الذي يستحيل معه استيعابها خارج تحديدات الشرط الإنساني أبداً ↗
Society is commonly too cheap. We meet at very short intervals, not having had time to acquire any new value for each other.We meet at meals three times a day, and give each other a new taste of that musty old cheese that we are. We have had to agree on a certain set of rules, called etiquette and politeness, to make this frequent meeting tolerable and that we need not come to open war. We meet at the post office, and at the sociable, and at the fireside every night; we live thick and are in each other's way, and stumble over one another, and I think that we thus lose some respect for one another. ↗
The man who has not the habit of reading is imprisoned in his immediate world, in respect to time and space. His life falls into a set routine; he is limited to contact and conversation with a few friends and acquaintances, and he sees only what happens in his immediate neighbourhood. From this prison there is no escape. But the moment he takes up a book, he immediately enters a different world, and if it is a good book, he is immediately put in touch with one of the best talkers of the world. This talker leads him on and carries him into a different country or a different age, or unburdens to him some of his personal regrets, or discusses with him some special line or aspect of life that the reader knows nothing about. An ancient author puts him in communion with a dead spirit of long ago, and as he reads along, he begins to imagine what the ancient author looked like and what type of person he was. ↗
#philosophy #reading #age
In some cases, I am able to respect what so many call bigots. Such people have a more solid foundation for drawing their lines when it comes to the security of their ways and quite possibly the security of mankind. They rely on something that has worked to get man this far without placing ideals blindly driven by emotion first; they have a sure line and they say, 'No.' That, in a sense, is something I find to be highly respectable. ↗
It seemed to a number of philosophers of language, myself included, that we should attempt to achieve a unification of Chomsky's syntax, with the results of the researches that were going on in semantics and pragmatics. I believe that this effort has proven to be a failure. Though Chomsky did indeed revolutionize the subject of linguistics, it is not at all clear, at the end the century, what the solid results of this revolution are. As far as I can tell there is not a single rule of syntax that all, or even most, competent linguists are prepared to agree is a rule. ↗
