I thought we were to discuss a referral which we believe contains substantial and credible information of potential impeachable offenses by the President of the United States. ↗
When we had highly sensitive information, the DNA on the dress, that was held within our office and the FBI. There was no dissemination of that information. ↗
You don't get to cut that chain of evidence and start over. You're always going to be pursued by your data shadow, which is forming from thousands and thousands of little leaks and tributaries of information. ↗
I recognized that information was, in many respects, like a public good, and it was this insight that made it clear to me that it was unlikely that the private market would provide efficient resource allocations whenever information was endogenous. ↗
Also, with information having just come out at the time about J. Edgar Hoover's electronic surveillance of Dr. King, it gave greater weight to the statements of those persons who were alleging involvement of the FBI. ↗